🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.